Visa @ Badiwars 3.0 - Mixed Corporate Challenge

🏢 VISA – COMPANY PERFORMANCE REPORT  

Badiwars 3.0 – Mixed Corporate Challenge (Tournament 6 of the Season)  

📍 Yuve Champions Academy | 📅 September 21  


---


## A) Company Summary Report (VISA)

Visa had a **small but active presence** in Tournament 6, featuring **6 players across 4 categories**. While the company did not register any podium finishes, Visa delivered strong participation across **Men’s Doubles, Mixed Doubles, 30+ Men’s Doubles, and 35+ Men’s Singles**. The standout run came from **R Venkateshwara Prasad**, who played in multiple categories and secured a key win in 35+ Men’s Singles before falling in the quarterfinals. Overall, Visa showed depth but lacked the finishing push needed to break into the medal rounds.


---


## B) Player-by-Player Performance Data


### 1) Suhas Rajasekar (Visa)  

**Category Played:** Men’s Doubles  

**Partner:** Sasekumar Elangovan (Visa)  

**Round Reached:** Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

- ❌ Lost to Devaiah M E (Dell) & Gaurav Ajila (Dell) – 10-21, 8-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  

**Summary:** Faced a strong Dell pair early and could not gain momentum in the opening round.


---


### 2) Sasekumar Elangovan (Visa)  

**Categories Played:** Men’s Doubles, 35+ Men’s Singles  

**Partner (MD):** Suhas Rajasekar (Visa)  

**Rounds Reached:**  

- Men’s Doubles: Round of 16  

- 35+ Men’s Singles: Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

**Men’s Doubles**

- ❌ Lost to Devaiah M E (Dell) & Gaurav Ajila (Dell) – 10-21, 8-21  


**35+ Men’s Singles**

- ❌ Lost to Alpesh Goyal (Qualcomm) – 14-21, 6-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 2 Losses  

**Summary:** Had a tough draw in both categories, facing strong opposition in straight-game defeats.


---


### 3) Preethi Subramanian (Visa)  

**Category Played:** Mixed Doubles  

**Partner:** Suhas Rajasekar (Visa)  

**Round Reached:** Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

- ❌ Lost to Manjunath MJ (Dell) & Aishwarya P (Dell) – 14-21, 18-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  

**Summary:** Competitive second game effort, but the Dell pair controlled the match in key moments.


---


### 4) R Venkateshwara Prasad (Visa)  

**Categories Played:** 30+ Men’s Doubles, 35+ Men’s Singles  

**Partner (30+ MD):** Aswartha Narayana (Visa)  

**Rounds Reached:**  

- 30+ Men’s Doubles: Quarterfinals (R8)  

- 35+ Men’s Singles: Quarterfinals (R8)  


**Match Results:**  

**30+ Men’s Doubles**

- ✅ Def Honnappa Shettikera & Tarun Kumar (Dell) – 21-19, 21-12  

- ❌ Lost to Amarnath Bansethi (Rockwell Automation) & Vivek Kumar (Brigade) – 9-21, 15-21  


**35+ Men’s Singles**

- ✅ Def Soumya Nayak (Exxonmobil) – 21-13, 21-14  

- ❌ Lost to Parikshith Shetty (Dell) – 13-21, 19-21  


**Record:** 2 Wins – 2 Losses  

**Summary:** Visa’s best performer of the tournament, delivering wins in both categories and showing strong consistency before bowing out in the quarterfinal stages.


---


### 5) Aswartha Narayana (Visa)  

**Category Played:** 30+ Men’s Doubles  

**Partner:** R Venkateshwara Prasad (Visa)  

**Round Reached:** Quarterfinals (R8)  


**Match Results:**  

- ✅ Def Honnappa Shettikera & Tarun Kumar (Dell) – 21-19, 21-12  

- ❌ Lost to Amarnath Bansethi (Rockwell Automation) & Vivek Kumar (Brigade) – 9-21, 15-21  


**Record:** 1 Win – 1 Loss  

**Summary:** Strong opening win, but ran into the eventual champions in the quarterfinals.


---


### 6) Santosh Bangalore (Visa)  

**Category Played:** 30+ Men’s Doubles  

**Partner:** Karteek Alluvada (Visa)  

**Round Reached:** Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

- ❌ Lost to Sylvester Prabhu & Thangadurai (Dell) – 21-17, 19-21, 19-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  

**Summary:** One of Visa’s toughest matches of the tournament, narrowly losing a 3-set thriller after taking the first game.


---


### 7) Karteek Alluvada (Visa)  

**Category Played:** 30+ Men’s Doubles  

**Partner:** Santosh Bangalore (Visa)  

**Round Reached:** Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

- ❌ Lost to Sylvester Prabhu & Thangadurai (Dell) – 21-17, 19-21, 19-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  

**Summary:** Came close to an upset win, but lost both tight closing sets by 2 points each.


---


### 8) Azahar Shaik (Visa)  

**Category Played:** 30+ Men’s Doubles  

**Partner:** Santosh Hirapur (CSG)  

**Round Reached:** Semifinals  


**Match Results:**  

- Bye in Round of 16  

- ⚠️ Walkover Win in Quarterfinals: Def Parikshith Shetty & Hitesh B (Dell) – 21-0, 21-0  

- ❌ Lost in Semifinals to Amarnath Bansethi (Rockwell Automation) & Vivek Kumar (Brigade) – 12-21, 11-21  


**Record (Played Matches Only):** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  

**Walkovers:** 1  

**Summary:** Reached the semifinals, but advancement was boosted by a walkover. Faced the strongest pair in the bracket and fell short in the semis.


---


### 9) Sasekumar Elangovan (Visa)  

**Category Played:** 35+ Men’s Singles  

**Round Reached:** Round of 16  


**Match Results:**  

- ❌ Lost to Alpesh Goyal (Qualcomm) – 14-21, 6-21  


**Record:** 0 Wins – 1 Loss  


---


## C) Best Visa Match of the Tournament  

🔥 **Santosh Bangalore (Visa) & Karteek Alluvada (Visa)** vs Sylvester Prabhu & Thangadurai (Dell)  

**Score:** 21-17, 19-21, 19-21  

A high-quality 3-set battle where Visa pushed Dell to the absolute limit, losing both deciders by just 2 points each.


---


## D) Visa Tournament Snapshot  

**Total Visa Players Featured:** 6  

**Categories Participated:**  

- Men’s Doubles  

- Mixed Doubles  

- 30+ Men’s Doubles  

- 35+ Men’s Singles  


**Total Matches Played by Visa (Excluding Byes & Walkovers):** 9  

**Total Wins:** 3  

**Total Losses:** 6  

**Total Walkovers Involving Visa:** 1 (in 30+ Men’s Doubles)  


**Podium Finishes:** None  

**Closest Match (Visa Involvement):**  

- Santosh Bangalore & Karteek Alluvada (Visa) lost 21-17, 19-21, 19-21  


**Best Performer (Visa):**  

🏅 **R Venkateshwara Prasad (Visa)** – 2 wins across two categories, strongest overall contributor for Visa.


**Overall Verdict:**  

Visa showed strong participation and fought hard in close matches, but the squad lacked a consistent winning run deep into finals territory. The foundation is solid—conversion into podium finishes is the next step.